Your survey looks perfect on paper. Every question is clear, your logic is solid, and you have covered all your bases. You still don’t know why you don’t get any responses.
The twist here is that the human brain does not care about the perfect plan.
While you’re focused on what to ask, research shows that even the survey design affects your results more than you might think
We are here to break it down for you.
Good survey design goes way beyond just asking questions. The BRUSO model tells us that questions need to be brief, relevant, unambiguous, specific, and objective. This helps reduce bias in the responses. Time matters a lot here. Studies prove that surveys longer than seven minutes lead to less involvement from respondents and lower quality data. The question layout makes a difference too. People respond differently to vertical answer choices compared to horizontal ones. Your choice of words, the order of items, and available response options create context effects that can twist your results.
Let’s start with understanding the psychology behind every survey response
Cognitive Steps Behind Survey Responses
People don't just read your questions and respond honestly. Their minds work through a complex process that can quietly sabotage your data quality before they even click submit.
Research reveals that survey respondents go through four distinct cognitive steps every time they encounter a question:
The Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology (CASM) model shows four distinct steps that happen each time someone reads a survey question:
- Comprehension - Understanding what you’re actually asking
- Retrieval - Searching their memory for relevant information
- Judgment - Forming an opinion based on what they remember
- Response - Selecting an answer that fits your provided options
Interpretation and memory retrieval in survey answering
Your respondents must first grasp what you're asking. This original comprehension phase involves understanding key terms, timeframes, and the exact information you need. Wrong interpretations of phrases like "formal educational program" or "typical day" can instantly lead to flawed data.
After understanding the question, respondents try to find relevant memories. In spite of that, this process has clear limits. Research shows about 70% of respondents who think they can remember their previous answers actually get them right. Only 36% of those who doubt their memory still give correct answers. Memory becomes harder to access with:
- Older information (memories fade over time)
- Non-distinctive events (routine activities blend together)
- Specific dates and numerical data
- Similar repeated experiences
Memory accessibility also depends on how deeply the brain processed information originally. Combined visual and verbal encoding creates stronger memories than either method by itself.
Judgment formation and response editing process
Respondents must make judgments based on partial memories after retrieving information. This judgment phase often needs estimation instead of exact recall. Studies show people often use mental shortcuts during this stage, especially with:
- Questions that need lots of mental effort
- Hard-to-access memories
- Time pressure
The final step requires respondents to fit their judgment into your answer options. They often adjust their answers based on:
- Social desirability (making themselves look good)
- Perceived expectations (what they believe you want)
- Response scale layout (horizontal vs. vertical orientation)
- Previous answers (matching earlier responses)
Knowledge of these cognitive steps helps you create surveys that align with natural thought processes and gives you more accurate research results.
Visual and Structural Biases in Survey Layout
Your survey's visual design shapes how people interpret and answer questions. Layout choices can add hidden biases that shape your research results in unexpected ways.
Vertical vs horizontal scale orientation effects
Scale orientation makes a bigger difference than you might expect. Vertical Likert scales have become popular because they save space and work better on mobile devices. But this convenience has drawbacks. Research shows that vertical Likert scales lead to higher Extreme Response Style (ERS) rates than horizontal ones.
This happens because vertical formats pack options closer together, which makes extreme answers seem less drastic. People pick extreme options more often as a result. One study found that participants showed higher ERS with vertical formats no matter what they were rating.
The good news is that some studies show the actual mean ratings stay similar between vertical and horizontal layouts. This tells us that while people spread their answers differently, the overall averages remain stable across formats.
Left-side bias in Likert-type scales
The direction of your scale creates another hidden bias. People tend to pick options they see on the left side of response scales - researchers have known this for almost 100 years. This "left-side bias" happens because of how we read and process information first, plus how motivated participants feel.
This bias shows up most with positive statements. People pick "Strongly Agree" more often when it's on the left versus the right side. This can bump up ratings by about 7.5% of the scale's range. Some newer studies suggest the effect might be smaller, around 1-2%.
Impact of inconsistent formatting on response accuracy
Bad formatting choices hurt response quality. Horizontal formats without enough space between options confuse people and lead to wrong answers. The way options line up on the right or left side can also create bias.
Long surveys make people tired. Face-to-face interviews usually last 50-90 minutes, phone calls run 30-60 minutes, and self-completed surveys take 10-20 minutes. After these times, people start giving the same answer to everything or just quit.
Psychological Biases That Skew Survey Results
Psychology plays a bigger role than visual design in how people answer your surveys. Mental shortcuts and habits can quietly mess up your data quality if you don't plan for them in your survey design.
Social desirability bias in self-reporting
People tend to answer questions in ways they think others will approve of - this is social desirability bias. This common behavior makes respondents overstate "good" actions and downplay "bad" ones. Survey participants often misrepresent sensitive topics like their eating habits, exercise routines, and drug use because they want to avoid judgment or feeling embarrassed.
Studies show this bias changes by a lot across different groups. Research reveals older people, specific ethnic groups, and low-income individuals are more likely to give socially acceptable answers. Culture also plays a vital role - societies that value working together show stronger social desirability bias than those focused on individual achievement.
Memory recall limitations in behavioral questions
Your survey accuracy depends on how well respondents remember things. About 70% of people who think they can recall their previous answers get them right. However, only 36% of those who doubt their memory actually give accurate responses.
Memory issues create two common problems in behavioral questions:
- Telescoping effect - Recent events seem far away while old events feel recent
- Episodic vs. semantic memory confusion - When asked about regular events over long periods, people use general knowledge instead of specific memories
Memory gets worse quickly as time passes, which makes questions about past events nowhere near as reliable.
Priming effects from earlier questions
Questions you ask first shape how people answer later ones - experts call this priming. To cite an instance, asking people what they think about their government affects how they respond to questions about welfare spending.
The assimilation-contrast theory explains this: once someone makes up their mind, they tend to stick with that view and make neutral information fit their original position. This happens because people quickly draw from their beliefs rather than carefully thinking through all the facts.
Priming can happen with questions that don't seem connected at all. Asking about favorite sports before questions about a company softball team might lead to lower interest if softball isn't their thing.
Design Surveys That Reveal the Truth With Surveysparrow
A personalized walkthrough by our experts. No strings attached!
Design Strategies to Minimize Hidden Biases
Survey design needs strategic techniques to fight hidden biases we talked about earlier. These proven methods will help your results show what people really think, not what your design makes them say.
Using the BRUSO model for question clarity
The BRUSO model gives you a framework to write questions with minimal cognitive bias. Your survey questions should be:
- Brief: Short questions help prevent survey fatigue
- Relevant: Only ask questions that match your research goals
- Unambiguous: Make sure there's just one way to interpret the question
- Specific: Each question should focus on one concept
- Objective: Don't let your opinions or preferred answers show through
This approach helps people understand questions quickly and reduces their need to take mental shortcuts that add bias.
Balancing response scales to reduce anchoring
Your choice of response options shapes how people answer questions. The best way is to create balanced scales with equal positive and negative choices around a neutral middle point. To name just one example, see how changing an unbalanced scale "Unlikely | Somewhat Likely | Likely | Very Likely | Extremely Likely" to "Extremely Unlikely | Somewhat Unlikely | As Likely as Not | Somewhat Likely | Extremely Likely" makes a difference.
This balance helps stop anchoring bias where early answers affect later responses. You can also mix up response options to reduce this effect even more.
Grouping related items to maintain cognitive flow
Questions that go together should stay together. This cuts down mental effort and leads to better answers. Survey flow tools let you keep related elements close—this keeps context clear and stops people from jumping between different topics.
SurveySparrow's easy-to-use survey tool builds on these psychological principles to help you get accurate results.
Avoiding double-barreled and leading questions
Double-barreled questions try to cover two different topics with one answer. A question like "How would you rate our product's quality and customer support?" should become two separate questions about product quality and support.
Leading questions can push people toward certain answers through biased language. A better approach changes "How happy are you that the kettle has high water capacity?" to "How satisfied are you with the kettle's water capacity?".
Conclusion
Understanding survey design psychology transforms how you collect data. When you recognize these hidden biases and design accordingly, you capture what people actually think rather than what your survey structure accidentally encourages them to say.
The most successful researchers don't fight human psychology—they design with it. Your next survey could reveal genuine insights instead of psychological artifacts.
Ready to apply these principles? The difference between good data and great insights often comes down to understanding the minds behind the responses.
